greenfield vs brownfield sap. In 2018, SAP rebranded Hybris under. greenfield vs brownfield sap

 
 In 2018, SAP rebranded Hybris undergreenfield vs brownfield sap 9/5 - this is how our customers rate us on Google on average

What are the pros and cons of greenfield vs brownfield vs selective There are different ways to migrate to SAP S/4HANA. With greenfield migration, enterprises can leverage the cloud to easily scale their infrastructure up or down, while with brownfield migration, the legacy systems may need. A greenfield project is creating a new template designed for SAP implementation from scratch, and a brownfield plan is a process of redeveloping the existing project. This allows you to adopt your. Security. The key is for developers to understand the differences in service approaches. 14% for greenfield, the rest being undecided. SAP S/4HANA is the next-generation business suite. A data clean up should take place and the source system has to be analyzed. Software development. Hybrid SAP S/4 Hana Migration Strategy. Greenfield Vs Brownfield. ICMR stands for Intercompany Matching and Reconciliation. The implementation option. . Brownfield Implementation. Some of the greatest advantages of Greenfield Software Development include: Gives an opportunity to implement a state-of-the-art technology solution from scratch. Greenfield land is undeveloped land - agricultural, landscaping, or natural. It doesn’t rock the boat and it’s easy enough to execute. "This is likely one of the most important and early decisions that will need to be made," said John Belden, project execution advisory services practice leader at Boston-based consultancy UpperEdge. In this blog post, we continue to share some of the findings on Greenfield vs. Compare SAP greenfield vs. With Selective Data Transition,. Project Development Timeframe. Our partners at LINKIT recently published the HANA Study 2019 - THE BREAKTHROUGH IS HERE. Innovative. Greenfield, brownfield, hybrid: pick your path to SAP S/4HANA. Are you debating greenfield vs brownfield for your S/4 journey? Don’t! There is so much content out there today to help companies decide whether to go greenfield or brownfield when they migrate their current SAP platform to S/4 HANA. It may also help you in deciding your transition strategy, for instance choosing between greenfield vs. On the other hand, in the Brownfield implementation, scalability is limited with the legacy systems but compatibility and user adoption is easy. First, let’s define what a brownfield system conversion is. If a company. Only two decades ago, this wasn’t such a hard decision. Choosing a greenfield vs. But what are these? Learn here. Even a simple search on around the ideal migration approach to SAP S/4 HANA will provide thousands of results. It covers the various tool options for greenfield approaches. To get you enabled to fully understand how to size the database of. During a brownfield investment, you will purchase or lease an existing site and redevelop it. Role: Devops…In principle, there are only two ways to transition from any ERP system to SAP S/4HANA. This is different from a greenfield implementation, where you start from scratch by re-implementing functionality and. SAP customers who are on ECC and looking at moving to S/4HANA will know about and understand at least two. Put simply these are bits of functionality that exist in SAP ECC but do not. brownfield-Organisations must choose whether to pursue a “greenfield” or a “brownfield” implementation and evaluate the pros and cons for each. In addition to the question of which project approach to choose (greenfield vs. Springfield vs. Yet a move to S/4HANA can seem overwhelming, as worries of ecosystem complexity force SAP customers to consider the greenfield vs. Brownfield project development is more sustainable, as it reduces the pressure on greenfield sites. brownfield approach: Which to use for S/4HANA. SAP Brownfield: Which is the better approach? Which approach is best suited for a migration to SAP S/4HANA and which path companies choose depends on numerous factors. Greenfield and brownfield are two unique software development concepts. A brownfield SAP S/4HANA implementation, on the other hand, always starts with an existing system, with only a few key parts modified. S/4HANA移行シナリオにおける “Greenfield”、”Brownfield”とは. A quick search on SAP greenfield vs brownfield will give you dozens of results with. By: David Essex. However, data and developments are also transferred - including old code, obsolete data and functions that either have no successor in SAP S/4HANA or were discontinued by SAP by the end of 2027. Greenfield vs Brownfield? Starting with a brand-new SAP S/4HANA system, using the greenfield approach may suit some organizations. One of the most discussed issues related to SAP S/4HANA migrations is the brownfield vs. In this series, host Qiraat Attar, content strategist for Foundry India, talks with leading CIOs, exploring the leadership, innovation and business strategy topics of. The Simplification List provides detailed information at the application level about exactly where the differences between the two suites lie - i. Familiarity: IT teams are already familiar with. Dig into what makes greenfield projects different from brownfield and retrofit projects in supply chain. The approach is. SAP ERP 6. Wir klären auf und geben eine Entscheidungshilfe. That simplicity is also its downside, though. Der Brownfield-Ansatz steht für ein Software-Upgrade, bei dem alle Daten und Einstellungen erhalten bleiben. Alien vs. I will compare the three options and will share main differences and some. Google Cloud public cloud services and SAP’s own HEC environment. Creation of archive files (Write) Delete from the database (Delete) Storage of archive files (Store and read) What are archiving objects. Each one provides a very different approach toward creating cutting-edge software. Bluefield. Brownfield 软件开发是指在现有或遗留软件系统存在的情况下开发和部署新的软件系统。. At an early stage, SAP Leonardo was synonymous with SAP's Internet of Things services and functions, whereas SAP CLEA was synonymous with machine learning services and functions. When transitioning to SAP S/4HANA, you have the option of choosing between a Greenfield, Brownfield, and Bluefield implementation approach. When deciding between SAP Greenfield vs Brownfield , there are several factors to consider, including budget, timeline, business goals, and IT infrastructure. In this approach, the organization retains some of its existing processes while implementing new processes to. Both approaches can concern many types of IT projects, such as a software tool, an app, a website, a network, or an IT facility. One option is to use a priority weight for each criteria in order of importance. Understand greenfield vs. Some developers prefer greenfield services and others prefer brownfields services. SAP Greenfield vs. 0 or ECC 6. ———— You might also like our blog Greenfield vs Brownfield Approach on Your Move to SAP S/4HANA ———— The Challenges of Moving to SAP HANA Breaking Down SAP S/4HANA Implementation Strategies: Greenfield, Brownfield, and Hybrid. A greenfield project can describe any project that a team starts from scratch. A hybrid approach combines elements of greenfield and brownfield SAP S/4HANA implementations for specific reasons. The terms brownfield and greenfield refer to how old a particular type of infrastructure is. After all, more than migrating your data and the custom programs you want to keep to S/4HANA, you’ll analyze your. 3 locations (Troisdorf, Berlin and in Switzerland) 2,000 successful projects in more than 70 countries. When shifting everything to the cloud, it may be difficult -- if not impossible -- to conduct a brownfield implementation. Sites that have not earlier been built on, are called greenfield. • Reviewed operational processes to support definition of best migration strategy for SAP S/4Hana upgrade of a major retail company; roadmap and key actions defined in 4 months (Greenfield vs. Support for SAP S/4HANA Brownfield Implementations – Make the green light, before its red! – Update June 2019. As an SAP Gold Partner, we use industry best practices for delivering successful S/4 implementation and. Raj: Greenfield basically means that it’s a brand-new implementation of S/4HANA and usually it is done when. In addition to the question of which project approach to choose (greenfield vs. You can duplicate and delete your current data, maintain settings and customize strategies and codes as needed and then migrate it into SAP S4 HANA, flawlessly. get in touch; India. First I will recap shortly the brownfield and greenfield approach to motivate the need for the selective data. I would like to mention, that beside the greenfield option, there is as well the option to perform a complete technical conversion of your system to S/4HANA (brownfield) and the SDT approach, which offers a mix between a pure greenfield and brownfield. Both routes come with their own advantages and challenges. RunWay Approach; RunningStart MethodologyJan. Greenfield land (image on the bottom) is land that has never been used for such industrial purposes. 200 employees at work. Summary. System Conversion (Brownfield): Software upgrade that preserves all data and settings. The readiness check reports will be the starting point if you want to understand the effort required for your transition to SAP GTS, edition for SAP HANA. The selected processes are based on the SAP best practice standard. 因此,任何新的软件架构都必须考虑并与现有系统共存——以增强现有的功能或能力. This is the most effective option for large corporations with extremely complicated frameworks. Brownfield Deployment. Greenfield is therefore the only available implementation approach. Greenfield approach: Squeaky clean S/4HANA authorizations vs. e. In this video series, we plan answer any questions our customers have for SAP S/4HANA including its deployment and transition paths, product roadmaps, servic. Since the 2010s we have another epic battle between two philosophies, in which the discourse is sometimes not much more rational than the question if the preferable hero should wear a red cape or a black mask: Greenfield versus Brownfield. Top 10 Evaluation Criteria for S/4HANA Implementation approach – Greenfield or Brownfield? Change management to target state – This criterion analyzes an organization’s capability for change management and effectiveness. Brownfield means that SAP experts upgrade the existing SAP ERP system to SAP S/4HANA in one step. Brownfield approach comparison. First I will recap shortly the brownfield and greenfield approach to motivate the need for. Greenfield vs. Main reason behind brownfield remains the preservation of location and lower project costs. How to decide between a Greenfield and Brownfield S/4HANA transition 11 21 33,232 For transitioning to S/4HANA there are two fundamental options. Brownfield: the right strategy. brownfield migration. S. The implementation option selected. Message. It is also imperative to follow the testing scenarios carefully, from unit and integration testing to system performance testing. An automated retrofit approach to your SAP S/4HANA migration significantly reduces the time, effort, and risk to ensure SAP changes are synchronized in parallel across the dual system landscapes. After all, the tidier the system, the smoother the migration to SAP S/4HANA later on. Top 10 Evaluation Criteria for S/4HANA Implementation approach – Greenfield or Brownfield? Change management to target state – This criterion analyzes an organization’s capability for change management and effectiveness. As you grow in your…1. Brownfield land (image on the top) is an area of land that has been used for commercial or industrial purposes. So, the basic meaning is that Greenfield is about “ground-up” projects while Brownfield projects happen when changes to the previously developed structures are made and incorporated. A related use of greenfield/brownfield occurs in the name of a US law: the "Brownfields law", signed by George W Bush in 2002, which limits liability for cleanup of "brownfield" sites for new owners. Recorded sessions are available in the SAP Learning. We make a perfect copy of a customer’s existing system and remove their data from it, keeping the configurations and custom development efforts, and migrate it to SAP S/4HANA,”. This is the most effective option for large corporations with extremely complicated frameworks. Brownfield. The initial decision for organisations is whether to go Greenfield (new clean S/4 installation) or Brownfield (system conversion but much more), or for more complex cases a ‘Selective Data Transition’. The first one is to purchase a brownfield site that’s closer to the city centre and infrastructure but has the potential to cause important environmental issues. SAP Sports One connects the most diverse information, such as injury history, fitness values, match analyses or real-time training data of a team or individual players. Depending on your starting point and systems, two main paths exist to migrating to SAP S/4HANA: greenfields and brownfields. Are you debating greenfield vs brownfield for your S/4 journey? Don’t! There is so much content out there today to help companies decide whether to go greenfield or. 2. The appeal of brownfield is in its simplicity: it moves the entire existing SAP ECC system to SAP S/4HANA. This is a vast improvement to the greenfield model, where OEMs rely on the replacement cycle to sell IoT technology as. intensive planning phase. CIO Leadership Live: India. A driven and passionate leader focused on speed and quality that has delivered large transformational programs enabling growth and business value. Currently, there is no shortage of content which helps organizations choose between the Greenfield and Brownfield approaches for SAP S/4 HANA migration. 0 as well but we are in Q4 and couldn't find 2. Converting your existing systems takes about 6 to 12 months. Greenfield vs brownfield in the IT world. Brownfield Data Centers The most importance difference between a Greenfield and Brownfield Data Center is in the approach to building it. Brownfield: keep the same structure, improve performance. greenfield model. Für SAP-Nutzer mit einer älteren Systemversion ändert sich das nun. The Brownfield Approach – System Conversion. brownfield implementation may require more investment, but it can provide more significant long-term benefits, such as increased efficiency and improved business. Adjustment of the objects and custom code to SAP HANA and SAP S/4HANA. The three Ps of Open RAN. The report also reveals that most organizations are still undecided when they want to. This approach allows you to implement a true upgrade or conversion of your system. Step 1:SAP implementations and upgrades whether Greenfield, Brownfield, Bluefield, or the new Yellowfield will now take up a fraction of the time they currently do today. Himanshu Sambhus SAP S/4HANA MM, IM, Central Procurement, Ariba SCC expert, highly experienced in implementation projects on-premise, cloud editions, brownfield conversion & greenfield with multi. When you need to resolve a brownfield deployment scenario, consider your existing Microsoft Azure environment as the place to start. Continue Reading About greenfield deployment Greenfield vs. com Conclusion. As that name suggests, a selective data transition provides a “selective” approach to migrate the best of both worlds—data and processes—to a new SAP S/4HANA environment. The meaning is similar across domains: greenfield. Greenfield. The Hybrid migration process is easier because. Brownfield, Greenfield, or Selective Data Migration? When preparing for your transition from SAP GTS 11. With the same, your organization can also predefine migration objectives and put down proper data governance practices. I will compare the three options and will share main differences and some. Published: 10 Mar 2022. 👇 Choose the best approach…On the other hand, the Brownfield approach is much easier than compared to a Greenfield in that these firms are upgrading from an older version of SAP, such as ECC 5. Making much-needed changes but keeping your data. Data Scope Engine – Identify relevant Data for SAP S/4HANA Transition Scenarios Greenfield & Selective Data Transition (SDT) Many articles and blog posts have been dedicated to the importance of moving from SAP ERP Central Component to SAP S/4HANA. SAP S/4HANA migration: A definitive guide. If central tax reporting is activated, local advance sales tax returns or recapitulative statements can also. As businesses continue to evolve, they must adopt new technologies and systems to stay competitive. The greenfield approach, on the other hand, usually takes longer. Once you have defined the business need and built a business case, you can select the best approach, develop a strategy, create your roadmap and make it happen. Categories. (+) When using Referenced Data Source Approach (RDS) Greenfield implementation. Greenfield, Brownfield & Bluefield Implementation Approach for SAP S4 HANA. With an SAP S/4HANA brownfield conversion, the ERP system can initially be converted in the course of a technical upgrade, allowing proven custom processes and structures to be retained in an innovative environment. “It’s a little far-fetched, but imagine needing a full engine replacement. The update to EHP 8 (SAP enhancement package 8 for SAP ERP 6. Introduction SAP Bluefield Implementation. SAP Ariba is a cloud-based platform for purchasing and procurement. It, in turn, can enable you to perform process simplification, reduce data footprint, or enable the newest SAP innovations. Once you have defined the business need and built a business case, you can select the best approach, develop a strategy, create your roadmap and make it happen. brownfield implementation. Brownfield scenario and choose one or a hybrid that best suits your needs, based on your company size,. Support for SAP S/4HANA Brownfield Implementations – Make the green light, before its red! – Update June 2019. brownfield approach for S/4HANA. project are carried out in a fairly traditional manner, and . With greenfield implementation we mean scenarios where no legacy coding is called. Either to convert the current system landscape to SAP S/4HANA (= Brownfield Approach) Or to adopt the Greenfield Approach, pretending the organisation has never used SAP before and start from scratch. Brownfield approach – Your quick and cost-efficient conversion to SAP S/4HANA. May 10, 2023 . An example could be the recent release of iOS 16. Update to EHP 8. 0), any idea where. Since the 2010s we have another epic battle between two philosophies, in which the discourse is sometimes not much more rational than the question if the preferable hero should wear a red cape or a black mask: Greenfield versus Brownfield. Hence we can also say, that the Greenfield approach is a time. These tools check the system and its code for. Greenfield and brownfield are the two prominent alternatives for transitioning to SAP S/4HANA. On the other hand, the Brownfield approach is much easier than compared to a Greenfield in that these firms are upgrading from an older version of SAP, such as ECC 5. Greenfield vs. greenfield issue -- or a third option known as a hybrid migration. It’s got to be at least as. A hybrid strategy blends features of both Greenfield and Brownfield SAP S/4 HANA processes. An embedded ABAP environment offers values for both greenfield and brownfield projects. So, before you go down the greenfield path, be sure you’re ready for an intense and involved re-engineering process. Denn hinter den Begriffen verbergen sich die Vorgehensmodelle, die den Weg zu SAP. In contrast to the brownfield approach, the greenfield approach is dependent on creating a clean, new concept. Greenfield and brownfield software development are two approa. Como se mencionó anteriormente, las inversiones nuevas y de remodelación son dos tipos de inversión extranjera directa. the migration of data without major process-related, functional and organisational changes?. In 2019, as in 2018, no clear trend of a. Greenfield vs. This entails danger, but it also creates opportunities. A hybrid implementation is a combination of both greenfield and brownfield approaches. Choosing a greenfield vs. We all know migration to SAP S/4 HANA is inevitable as organization will need to close the innovation gap, sooner the decision made better the competitive advantage organization will get. Using the Brownfield approach, you can get SAP S/4HANA up and running, and at the same time, migrate your existing SAP workflows. The Greenfield implementation method denotes a clean slate, a fresh start with a. Brownfield: the (multi) million-dollar question. The brownfield deployments may face a. mas não é caso). Greenfield and Brownfield, as the realization approaches to S/4HANA, are equally favored. Brownfield implementation for your SAP S/4HANA journey? Don’t!Greenfield Implementation: Typically requires more time and resources due to the need for creating everything anew, including infrastructure, configurations, and integrations. Brownfield, Greenfield and Bluefield are the three main approaches for moving to SAP S/4HANA. A success story. Brownfield: the (multi) million-dollar question. Thanks, AJ. Overall, the biggest advantage of SAP BRFplus is the separation of business rules from the rest of the logic and other code. This approach allows business departments to flexibly adapt volatile business rules within a short period of time. The number of households has risen by 30% in the UK since. Over 25 years of experience and expertise as an SAP management consultancy. SAP Greenfield vs. The SAP standard and SAP best practices. However, this option is only available to customers currently running SAP ECC 6. These projects don’t rely on. Shelbyville. Although it does have its complexities, it is the simplest approach, and quite possibly the quickest. It has a long list of modifications to current features, as well as some new features that were added. It is precisely this additional effort that is the advantage. To lay more solid ground, tools from SAP can be used to perform an advance check of the systems for the migration. Batman vs. sap s/4hana greenfield vs brownfield vs bluefield SAP Bluefield Implementation: A Path to Intelligent and Agile Business Transformation. Smart Greenfield - Mix & Match. SAP network great migration content from Vignesh Barani Sivakumar 👨🏻‍💻. Prepare the source sandbox system to be converted, mainly adjusting the relevant items coming from the SI_Checks on the system. In between the following groups different roles may need to perform (at least a greenfield) sizing: SAP. Source: SAP. No compulsion to work within the constraints of existing systems or infrastructure. References: SAP Business Technology Platform ABAP. Bluefield. The Advantages of a Greenfield Project. Greenfield represents a total shift. Breaking Down SAP S/4HANA Implementation Strategies: Greenfield, Brownfield, and Hybrid. A hybrid approach combines elements of greenfield and brownfield SAP S/4HANA implementations for specific reasons. In previous blogs, we discussed what Greenfield and. brownfield approach: Which to use for S/4HANA; How to modernize your legacy ERP system Hybrid: make much-needed changes but keep your data. 0), however organizations that are already on SAP can also choose this route. These customers are the most recent adopters of SAP (past 3-5 years), and they can maintain the structure they currently have in place and update it to run under S/4HANA. History of SAP S/4HANA. You can find out how the approaches differ in the article Greenfield vs. But is it really feasible? What about the years of customization, modifications and testing you've already invested in your current ECC system? According to an SAPInsider report, while early adopters preferred the. A brownfield deployment, in information technology, is the installation and configuration of new hardware or software that must coexist with legacy IT systems. Brownfield Implementation: The brownfield approach is a popular method for upgrading existing SAP S/4HANA systems that have been in use for at least a year. July 20, 2023. SAP SAP S/4HANA Sales Certified | Senior Associate Consultant | Agile Project Management Certified by Google | work on Implementation. Determining which approach works best is based on the specific needs and goals of an organization. Brownfield vs. The Greenfield implementation means doing the fully new implementation in the SAP system where we have to start everything from scratch. While the system conversion (brownfield approach) transfers the existing systems and processes into the new world of SAP S/4HANA, the greenfield approach means a new implementation of systems and processes. , 2 tier (DEV-PROD) or 3-tier (DEV-QAS-PROD)), SAP ECS will complete the TMS setup and system handover happens with standard transport routes configuration. As each methodology has its advantages and challenges. Greenfield software development refers to creating a framework for a completely new environment, and it necessitates starting from scratch with no existing code. One of the most discussed issues related to SAP S/4HANA migrations is the brownfield vs. " A company performs a new implementation of SAP S/4HANA and uses its existing ECC system as a legacy. The greenfield approach is a completely new implementation, allowing you to design systems and workflows from scratch. Alternatively, a greenfield investment involves buying a site on which you will need to construct a building. A hybrid project is a situation where clients may have part of their project in greenfield and other parts in brownfield. 0, I saw some old slides which suggested that by Q3 2019 we should have the conversion option in 2. This implies that any new software architecture must take into account and coexist with live. When considering an SAP S/4HANA transformation, organizations have a range of options to choose from, including the Greenfield, Brownfield, and Bluefield approaches. Greenfield: Building a completely new installation of SAP S/4HANA, essentially starting from scratch and defining a wholly new operating model. It’s especially important as new, power- and data-hungry workloads, such as the internet of things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), and high-performance computing. Greenfield vs. The combination makes it possible to understand, plan, and manage the SAP S/4HANA transformation from all possible dimensions. 3. SAP S/4HANA. Selective Data Transition is an alternative to the New Implementation approach (also called greenfield) or System Conversion approach (also called brownfield). There are different ways to SAP S/4HANA: Greenfield, Brownfield or even a selective migration. Greenfield vs. Retire unused code, Custom code migration and developments with modern cloud ABAP is a go-forward strategy to become cloud competent, modularized, and agile for business needs. Brownfield or Greenfield? When it comes to the main SAP S/4HANA migration approaches, there are two of them: Brownfield and Greenfield. Each approach offers distinct. This is a brand-new system. In this article I’ll focus on the “how. Springfield vs. A greenfield project may make the most sense if you are starting from nothing or expanding rapidly. So back to the SAP S/4HANA move: Everyone in the SAP world is familiar with the terms greenfield and brownfield, maybe you know them as New Implementation and System Conversion. Soft skillsBrownfield has its own advantages but comparatively it can be managed using the cloud applications. This blog describes the options and aims to help you determine which is right based on your situation and goals. Blogs (5). Greenfield vs. Through brownfield IoT implementations, OEMs can realize new revenue opportunities from existing customers by selling IoT capabilities for equipment that’s already in the field. SAP S/4HANA Implementation: Greenfield vs. The closer you are to the brownfield end of the continuum, the easier it is to extract, transform and load historical data as part of the migration. The term “Brownfield vs Greenfield” is frequently heard while project execution. The implementation option. This paper describes our experience of developing a new system (Greenfield development) after continuously extending an existing one (Brownfield development) for a long time. This blog post is covering the important question of data scoping, providing an. The migration itself is easier, since it. Brownfield, Greenfield und Bluefield sind die Bezeichnungen methodischer Ansätze, mit denen sich Handelsunternehmen in ihrem Geschäftsalltag bislang nicht befassen mussten. In other words, both approaches follow an extract, transform and load data conversion process. Greenfield Implementation is a relatively simple option for the S/4HANA transition that enables businesses to reduce Time-to-Value and Total-Cost-of-Ownership through the fast adoption of predefine. Such projects are deemed higher risk, as they are often for new infrastructure, new customers, and even new owners. Then we design the target landscape and carry out a fit-gap analysis. Greenfield and Brownfield investments are two types of foreign direct investment. 5 (basic platform for SAP applications) is required to run SAP S/4HANA - and so is EHP 8. without a separate data extraction (ETL process). If you want to migrate to SAP S/4HANA on Premise you do have the following three options: System Conversion (aka “Brownfield-Approach”) New Implementation (aka “Greenfield-Approach”) Selective Data Transition to SAP S/4HANA. brownfield implementation. You cannot apply the same management style to both types of projects. 15,000 users in application management. Each one provides a very different approach toward creating cutting-edge software. This meticulous approach supports a gradual transformation, letting day-to-day operations glide along with minimal hiccups. As long as the legacy system, e. If SAP GTS 11. Understanding Greenfield, Brownfield, and Hybrid approach to ERP migration. Last time I talked about how “greenfield” and “brownfield” are outdated approaches to your digital transformation as every company has a unique starting point, goals, risk tolerance and more. It doesn’t rock the boat and it’s easy enough to execute. comFollow usLinked In: vs. Accenture’s implementation took six months and set the foundation for the SAP S/4HANA upgrade to. It is precisely this additional effort that is the advantage. SAP S/4HANA is the core product of SAP SE. -----. Core vs non-core and greenfield vs brownfield First some explanations of the terminology used “Infrastructure” can take many forms and has many classifications, but the basic distinction is between “core” and “non-core” infrastructure:SAP BRFplus: Summary of advantages and disadvantages. Overall, both these terms are related to any kind of. S4 Implementation – and specifically the greenfield versus brownfield approach – was the focus of a roundtable discussion at the most recent ASUG Michigan Chapter meeting, which took place in October in. The Greenfield approach lets organizations predefine migration objects and best practices available in the new platform. The movement needs some specialized tools (available from SAP and other tools vendors) to extract the current configuration– without the data– and move it over to S/4HANA, followed by selectively choose data to move forward with. SAP S/4HANA Discovery – Greenfield vs. Are you debating Greenfield vs. The first one is greenfield implementation, where you’ll have to begin from a new slate. No compulsion to work within the constraints of existing systems or infrastructure. “We make a perfect copy of a customer’s existing system and remove their data from it, keeping the configurations and custom development efforts, and migrate it to. Greenfield vs brownfield SAP customers undergoing major disruption and change often take the opportunity to redesign business models and enabling platforms (‘Greenfield’ approach).